14:30:24 #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2016-08-19 14:30:24 #info asmacdo has joined triage 14:30:25 Meeting started Fri Aug 19 14:30:24 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is asmacdo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:30:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:30:25 The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2016_08_19' 14:30:25 asmacdo has joined triage 14:30:30 #info mhrivnak has joined triage 14:30:30 !here 14:30:30 mhrivnak has joined triage 14:30:37 !here 14:30:37 #info ttereshc has joined triage 14:30:37 ttereshc has joined triage 14:31:13 !next 14:31:14 4 issues left to triage: 2172, 2173, 2177, 2190 14:31:15 #topic Reduce memory leaks - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2172 14:31:15 Pulp Issue #2172 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:31:15 Reduce memory leaks - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2172 14:31:23 !here 14:31:23 #info jortel has joined triage 14:31:23 jortel has joined triage 14:31:38 ttereshc, you snuck one in :) 14:31:45 asmacdo, :P 14:32:37 As noted on the bug, I think this is more of a refactor or enhancement request. 14:32:41 mhrivnak, when we convert this one to a story, do you have a suggestion for a new more descriptive name? 14:33:34 depends. If we go with that setting, it could be "as a user, I can set a value for the celery $MAX_WHATEVER setting". 14:34:53 I could also see it as a refactor, since it's not adding a new behavior that directly affects the user. 14:35:49 Also to be clear, I'm not sure we should make any changes based on this request, but I do want to capture it at least. 14:36:58 anyone else have thoughts? :) 14:37:06 maybe it is a story if more investigation is needed 14:37:31 I am not sure how I'd like to approach this then. I don't want a dev to spend time trying to understand and make this change, so whatever we do, we should add a comment that some team discussion should happen before work begins. 14:38:27 I think our process should facilitate that already. 14:38:27 I propose Task: investigate memory usage improvements 14:38:41 It needs to be groomed and put on a sprint before anyone should be making the change. 14:39:01 That seems reasonable. 14:39:04 mhrivnak, only if it is a story, refactors don't need to be groomed. 14:39:27 !propose other Convert to task 14:39:27 #idea Proposed for #2172: Convert to task 14:39:28 Proposed for #2172: Convert to task 14:39:30 +1 for task 14:39:32 asmacdo, hm. Perhaps I need to re-read the policy then. 14:39:51 mhrivnak, I might be wrong too, I should re-read it also. 14:39:55 in any case, it still neds to be put on a sprint first. 14:40:00 And we have a process for that. :) 14:40:19 !here 14:40:19 #info jcline has joined triage 14:40:19 jcline has joined triage 14:40:31 jcline, you want a word in here before I accept? 14:41:01 I'm fine with the task, it's not ever clear that memory's actually leaking 14:41:04 even 14:41:05 +1 task 14:41:14 !accept 14:41:14 #agreed Convert to task 14:41:15 Current proposal accepted: Convert to task 14:41:16 #topic /bin/systemctl status pulp_celerybeat.service fails to start and will fail until several attempts have been tried - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2173 14:41:16 3 issues left to triage: 2173, 2177, 2190 14:41:16 Pulp Issue #2173 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:41:17 /bin/systemctl status pulp_celerybeat.service fails to start and will fail until several attempts have been tried - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2173 14:41:25 Still waiting on logs for this 14:41:29 #idea Proposed for #2173: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:41:29 !propose skip 14:41:29 #info smyers has joined triage 14:41:29 smyers has joined triage 14:41:30 Proposed for #2173: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:41:36 +1 skip 14:41:40 +1 14:41:50 +1 14:41:57 haha, I refereshed my tab and they were posted 2 minutes ago 14:42:00 they are there 14:42:03 But still, not gonna read those now 14:42:50 yeah, its a tarball, lets crack that open before tuesday 14:43:03 !accept 14:43:03 #agreed Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:43:03 Current proposal accepted: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:43:03 Yeah 14:43:04 #topic download_repo task fails to mark some units as downloaded - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2177 14:43:05 2 issues left to triage: 2177, 2190 14:43:05 Pulp Issue #2177 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:43:06 download_repo task fails to mark some units as downloaded - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2177 14:43:47 I'm fine with normal/medium 14:43:58 Me too. 14:44:20 This is a somewhat unusual use case. For now, it's mostly katello devs who care about it. 14:44:32 !propose accept 14:44:32 #idea Proposed for #2177: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:33 Proposed for #2177: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:43 fine 14:44:52 !accept 14:44:52 #agreed Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:52 Current proposal accepted: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:53 1 issues left to triage: 2190 14:44:54 #topic Unit is associated with the repo before it is copied to the final location - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2190 14:44:54 RPM Support Issue #2190 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:44:54 Unit is associated with the repo before it is copied to the final location - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2190 14:45:43 Seems pretty bad 14:45:56 High/High? 14:46:32 Is this a result of the investigation into missing/corrupt files even with validate=True? 14:47:11 Agreed. It seems quite reasonable that the files should be in their final location before adding the unit to the DB. 14:47:13 what version is this reported against? 14:47:18 kinda) I tried to do post copy validation and hitted this bug 14:47:30 Wait a second, ttereshc can this occur in the wild? 14:47:36 "raise Exception('bla-bla')" catches my eye 14:47:36 I suspect this is in 2.8+ 14:48:06 me to. probably early 2.8 14:48:07 asmacdo, if shutil.copy will fail for some reason 14:48:14 asmacdo, it's just a demo that an Exception gets through 14:48:51 Also presumably if the worker was killed 14:49:17 Ok, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't purely hypothetical. 14:49:28 #idea Proposed for #2190: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:49:28 !propose triage high high 14:49:28 Proposed for #2190: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:49:38 oh, looking into the code i thinnk in rpm sync it was like this all the time, it is not a regression 14:50:16 ttereshc++ good find 14:50:30 !accept 14:50:30 #agreed Priority: High, Severity: High 14:50:30 Current proposal accepted: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:50:31 No issues to triage. 14:50:34 ipanova, but it is still quite bad 14:50:37 it is 14:50:50 bit fortunately it is an easy fix 14:50:59 s/bit/but 14:51:16 mmm, we'll see ;) 14:51:44 So few things are really easy fixes :( 14:53:05 asmacdo, !end? 14:53:10 !end 14:53:10 #endmeeting