14:30:33 #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2016-08-23 14:30:33 #info asmacdo has joined triage 14:30:33 !start 14:30:33 Meeting started Tue Aug 23 14:30:33 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is asmacdo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:30:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:30:33 The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2016_08_23' 14:30:33 asmacdo has joined triage 14:30:44 !here 14:30:44 #info pcreech has joined triage 14:30:45 pcreech has joined triage 14:30:57 #info bmbouter has joined triage 14:30:57 !here 14:30:57 bmbouter has joined triage 14:31:01 #info jortel has joined triage 14:31:01 !here 14:31:01 jortel has joined triage 14:31:03 !here 14:31:03 #info ttereshc has joined triage 14:31:04 ttereshc has joined triage 14:31:38 #info ipanova has joined triage 14:31:38 !here 14:31:39 ipanova has joined triage 14:31:40 !here 14:31:40 #info mhrivnak has joined triage 14:31:41 mhrivnak has joined triage 14:32:02 !next 14:32:03 5 issues left to triage: 2173, 2191, 2192, 2195, 2198 14:32:04 #topic /bin/systemctl status pulp_celerybeat.service fails to start and will fail until several attempts have been tried - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2173 14:32:04 Pulp Issue #2173 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:32:05 /bin/systemctl status pulp_celerybeat.service fails to start and will fail until several attempts have been tried - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2173 14:32:40 I glanced at the logs briefly, and I am guessing the services are just started out of order? 14:32:56 I just did a log anaysis and posted a new comment 14:33:06 you'll probably need to reload I just finished it 14:33:21 that is the error Qpid raises when the selector thread has died... 14:33:37 it's a fatal error so it's right for Pulp to not retry 14:33:42 Ah ok. 14:34:09 bmbouter, do you know enough to propose priority? 14:34:34 I think normal prio high sev 14:34:39 or normal prio norm sev 14:34:46 but for this user they cannot work around it I think 14:35:38 #idea Proposed for #2173: Priority: Normal, Severity: High 14:35:38 !propose triage normal high 14:35:38 Proposed for #2173: Priority: Normal, Severity: High 14:36:07 works for me 14:36:15 !accept 14:36:15 #agreed Priority: Normal, Severity: High 14:36:15 Current proposal accepted: Priority: Normal, Severity: High 14:36:16 4 issues left to triage: 2191, 2192, 2195, 2198 14:36:17 #topic The RPM rsync distributor's "predistributor_id" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2191 14:36:17 RPM Support Issue #2191 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:36:17 The RPM rsync distributor's "predistributor_id" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2191 14:37:30 !propose accept 14:37:30 #idea Proposed for #2191: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:37:30 Proposed for #2191: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:37:55 +1 14:38:14 +1 14:38:19 Since its just a validation issue, I don't think this or the next should be blocking or anything. 14:38:50 there is a validation later, but not during distributor creation 14:40:04 !accept 14:40:04 #agreed Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:40:04 Current proposal accepted: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:40:05 3 issues left to triage: 2192, 2195, 2198 14:40:06 I'm lost at 'predistributor_id' 14:40:06 #topic The RPM rsync distributor's "root" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2192 14:40:07 RPM Support Issue #2192 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:40:07 The RPM rsync distributor's "root" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2192 14:40:15 sorry jortel we can go back 14:40:31 !issue 2191 14:40:32 #topic The RPM rsync distributor's "predistributor_id" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2191 14:40:32 RPM Support Issue #2191 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:40:32 The RPM rsync distributor's "predistributor_id" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2191 14:40:39 asmacdo: no, problem. I'm find with the decision 14:40:53 asmacdo: i think we should ask dkliban because he does that validation later and maybe on purpose 14:41:16 ipanova, you propose skip? 14:41:34 asmacdo: yes, i suggest that Denis first would take a closer look at it 14:41:59 I'm also fine with that. 14:42:04 works for me. 14:42:07 !propose skip 14:42:07 #idea Proposed for #2191: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:42:07 Proposed for #2191: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:42:17 +1 14:42:19 +1 14:42:21 !accept 14:42:21 #agreed Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:42:21 Current proposal accepted: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:42:22 3 issues left to triage: 2192, 2195, 2198 14:42:22 #topic The RPM rsync distributor's "root" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2192 14:42:23 RPM Support Issue #2192 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:42:23 The RPM rsync distributor's "root" config option isn't validated - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2192 14:42:38 sorry, asmacdo, didn't mean to be disruptive. 14:43:00 np jortel, thats how this is supposed to work! 14:43:46 !propose skip 14:43:46 #idea Proposed for #2192: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:43:47 Proposed for #2192: Skip this issue for this triage session. 14:43:48 same reasons 14:43:55 +1 14:44:06 Is there reason to believe this is done on purpose also? 14:44:25 I don't think there is a reason 14:44:40 i also think there is no later validation for that 14:44:50 I think QE did a good amount of validation testing 14:44:52 !propose accept 14:44:52 #idea Proposed for #2192: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:53 Proposed for #2192: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:44:59 but i doubt that there is any validation for 'remote' part 14:45:20 +1 accept 14:46:27 !accept 14:46:27 #agreed Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:46:27 Current proposal accepted: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state. 14:46:28 2 issues left to triage: 2195, 2198 14:46:29 #topic can't sync unit that was previously uploaded - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2195 14:46:29 Pulp Issue #2195 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:46:29 can't sync unit that was previously uploaded - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2195 14:47:13 sounds bad to me 14:48:10 * mhrivnak added a comment asking about the version it was seen on 14:49:08 mhrivnak, do you want that info before we triage this? 14:49:27 !propose high high 14:49:27 Error: "propose" is not a valid command. 14:49:35 #idea Proposed for #2195: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:49:35 !propose triage high high 14:49:36 Proposed for #2195: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:49:38 nah 14:50:02 +1 14:50:07 !accept 14:50:07 #agreed Priority: High, Severity: High 14:50:07 Current proposal accepted: Priority: High, Severity: High 14:50:09 #topic Timestamp not updated for changed docker_tag - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2198 14:50:09 1 issues left to triage: 2198 14:50:09 Docker Support Issue #2198 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium 14:50:10 Timestamp not updated for changed docker_tag - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/2198 14:50:47 we should tag this onto the 2.11 release as a requriement for releasing it 14:51:27 agreed. 14:51:46 maybe high/normal 14:52:09 !propose triage high normal 14:52:09 #idea Proposed for #2198: Priority: High, Severity: Medium 14:52:09 Proposed for #2198: Priority: High, Severity: Medium 14:52:19 works for me 14:52:44 (side note, smyers++ for the robustness normal=medium) 14:53:02 !accept 14:53:02 #agreed Priority: High, Severity: Medium 14:53:02 Current proposal accepted: Priority: High, Severity: Medium 14:53:04 No issues to triage. 14:53:19 one more thing, I am on PTO on Friday 14:53:26 volunteer to run triage? 14:55:22 !end 14:55:22 #endmeeting