15:30:37 <dalley> #startmeeting Pulp Triage 2018-01-12
15:30:37 <dalley> #info dalley has joined triage
15:30:37 <pulpbot> Meeting started Fri Jan 12 15:30:37 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dalley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:30:37 <pulpbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:30:37 <pulpbot> The meeting name has been set to 'pulp_triage_2018_01_12'
15:30:37 <pulpbot> dalley: dalley has joined triage
15:30:42 <daviddavis> !here
15:30:42 <daviddavis> #info daviddavis has joined triage
15:30:42 <pulpbot> daviddavis: daviddavis has joined triage
15:30:43 <asmacdo> doing it this way allows you to name the manifest file whatever
15:30:44 <jortel> it seemed unnecessarily restrictive to require the file have a special name.
15:30:44 <milan_> #info milan_ has joined triage
15:30:44 <milan_> !here
15:30:44 <pulpbot> milan_: milan_ has joined triage
15:30:45 <dkliban> !here
15:30:45 <dkliban> #info dkliban has joined triage
15:30:46 <pulpbot> dkliban: dkliban has joined triage
15:30:53 <asmacdo> !here
15:30:53 <asmacdo> #info asmacdo has joined triage
15:30:53 <pulpbot> asmacdo: asmacdo has joined triage
15:30:55 <dalley> !next
15:30:56 <pulpbot> dalley: 7 issues left to triage: 3255, 3256, 3257, 3258, 3259, 3270, 3277
15:30:56 <bmbouter> !here
15:30:56 <dalley> #topic pulp-consumer does not remove binding if repo is no longer available on server - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3255
15:30:56 <bmbouter> #info bmbouter has joined triage
15:30:57 <pulpbot> Issue #3255 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:30:58 <pulpbot> pulp-consumer does not remove binding if repo is no longer available on server - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3255
15:30:59 <pulpbot> bmbouter: bmbouter has joined triage
15:31:06 <jortel> daviddavis: let's discuss that when we do planning for the file plugin.
15:31:07 <asmacdo> !propose skip
15:31:07 <asmacdo> #idea Proposed for #3255: Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:31:07 <pulpbot> asmacdo: Proposed for #3255: Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:31:14 <daviddavis> jortel: sounds good
15:31:28 <jortel> !here
15:31:28 <jortel> #info jortel has joined triage
15:31:28 <pulpbot> jortel: jortel has joined triage
15:32:02 <dalley> !accept
15:32:02 <dalley> #agreed Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:32:02 <pulpbot> dalley: Current proposal accepted: Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:32:03 <pulpbot> dalley: 6 issues left to triage: 3256, 3257, 3258, 3259, 3270, 3277
15:32:03 <ipanova> !here
15:32:03 <dalley> #topic all sslclientcert in pulp.repo are called client.crt - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3256
15:32:03 <ipanova> #info ipanova has joined triage
15:32:04 <pulpbot> Issue #3256 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:32:05 <pulpbot> all sslclientcert in pulp.repo are called client.crt - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3256
15:32:06 <pulpbot> ipanova: ipanova has joined triage
15:32:34 <asmacdo> this seems like a reasonable request, would it be backwards compatible?
15:33:02 <ttereshc> !here
15:33:02 <ttereshc> #info ttereshc has joined triage
15:33:02 <pulpbot> ttereshc: ttereshc has joined triage
15:34:42 <ipanova> thomasmckay: sorry i  was in a meeting i hope you got your answer
15:35:04 <bmbouter> since it's a bug semver allows a backwards incompatible change
15:35:08 <bmbouter> I think it would be backwards incompatible
15:35:38 <bmbouter> which should be ok because it's a bug. we should add a backwards incompatible section to the release notes though
15:35:53 <jortel> agreed
15:35:56 <bmbouter> I don't recommend adding to the sprint
15:36:32 <thomasmckay> ipanova: yes, thanks
15:36:47 <jortel> +1 not added to sprint
15:36:50 <asmacdo> !propose accept
15:36:50 <asmacdo> #idea Proposed for #3256: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:36:51 <dkliban> +1
15:36:51 <pulpbot> asmacdo: Proposed for #3256: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:36:52 <bmbouter> I can comment w/ all of this on the ticket if others think we should accept
15:37:00 <dalley> +1
15:37:04 <asmacdo> bmbouter +1
15:37:07 <bmbouter> ack
15:37:08 <ttereshc> +1
15:37:09 <bmbouter> will do
15:37:19 <dalley> !accept
15:37:19 <dalley> #agreed Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:37:19 <pulpbot> dalley: Current proposal accepted: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:37:20 <pulpbot> dalley: 5 issues left to triage: 3257, 3258, 3259, 3270, 3277
15:37:20 <dalley> #topic pulp does not ask, provide or configure entitlement certificate key - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3257
15:37:21 <pulpbot> Issue #3257 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:37:22 <pulpbot> pulp does not ask, provide or configure entitlement certificate key - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3257
15:37:51 <dalley> bmbouter, just to avoid edit conflicts, could you also mark as triaged?
15:38:51 <bmbouter> dalley: yes
15:39:22 <dkliban> this one sounds like a story
15:39:36 <asmacdo> i'm surprised this isn't in a CONFIG somewhere
15:40:14 <ipanova> i thought it's the options to use like --auth-cert
15:40:23 <ipanova> which are available via cli
15:40:52 * asmacdo misses randy :(
15:40:59 <ipanova> --auth-cert - full path to the entitlement certificate that will be given to
15:40:59 <ipanova> bound consumers to grant access to this repository
15:41:21 <jortel> why would pulp need the key?
15:41:34 <dkliban> oh
15:41:46 <bmbouter> agreed, it should just need the cert
15:42:37 <dkliban> let's skip this one for now and leave some comments on the issue
15:42:44 <dkliban> i think we all have some questions
15:42:50 <jortel> +1
15:43:25 <dalley> !propose skip
15:43:25 <dalley> #idea Proposed for #3257: Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:43:25 <pulpbot> dalley: Proposed for #3257: Skip this issue for this triage session.
15:43:44 <ttereshc> +1
15:44:44 <jortel> oh, I know why .. it's because in pulp2 the agent will create the .repo file on the consumer as part of bind.
15:46:53 <jortel> as a work around, the user can put the key in the cert file.  yum will work with that.
15:47:09 <jortel> I'll update the issue.
15:47:13 <dkliban> jortel: thank you
15:47:16 <jortel> er, comment
15:47:20 <bmbouter> ty
15:47:35 <dalley> so is this still a skip?
15:47:42 <dalley> or an accept + eddit
15:47:46 <dalley> *edit
15:47:51 <bmbouter> +1 to accept and edit
15:48:17 <dalley> !propose other accept and jortel will comment
15:48:17 <dalley> #idea Proposed for #3257: accept and jortel will comment
15:48:17 <pulpbot> dalley: Proposed for #3257: accept and jortel will comment
15:48:26 <asmacdo> +1
15:49:06 <dalley> !accept
15:49:06 <dalley> #agreed accept and jortel will comment
15:49:06 <pulpbot> dalley: Current proposal accepted: accept and jortel will comment
15:49:08 <dalley> #topic Update with new recipe for v2s1 manifest upload  - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3258
15:49:08 <pulpbot> dalley: 4 issues left to triage: 3258, 3259, 3270, 3277
15:49:09 <pulpbot> Issue #3258 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:49:10 <pulpbot> Update with new recipe for v2s1 manifest upload  - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3258
15:49:31 <dkliban> accept as a documentation bug
15:49:41 <asmacdo> +1
15:49:48 <asmacdo> ipanova: should we add to sprint?
15:49:54 <bmbouter> it should have the docs tag
15:50:16 <ipanova> i got some input from dkliban and we decided to accept this as a docs bug
15:50:20 <dalley> !propose other accept and add docs tag
15:50:20 <dalley> #idea Proposed for #3258: accept and add docs tag
15:50:20 <pulpbot> dalley: Proposed for #3258: accept and add docs tag
15:50:41 <ipanova> and in addition to open a new one, which will deal with last paragraph issues in the description
15:50:50 <ipanova> unless there will be other feedback in the team
15:51:45 <bmbouter> on sprint?
15:51:52 <ipanova> 1) accept as docs bug, add to sprint 2) ipanova will open an new issue and add to sprint as well
15:51:57 <bmbouter> thx
15:52:00 <bmbouter> +1
15:52:08 <asmacdo> +1
15:52:20 <ipanova> i will comment about 2) so i don't forget
15:52:43 <dkliban> +1
15:52:46 <dalley> !propose other accept + add to sprint + mark as docs bug, ipanova will split part into a new issue
15:52:46 <dalley> #idea Proposed for #3258: accept + add to sprint + mark as docs bug, ipanova will split part into a new issue
15:52:46 <pulpbot> dalley: Proposed for #3258: accept + add to sprint + mark as docs bug, ipanova will split part into a new issue
15:52:48 <dalley> !accept
15:52:48 <dalley> #agreed accept + add to sprint + mark as docs bug, ipanova will split part into a new issue
15:52:48 <pulpbot> dalley: Current proposal accepted: accept + add to sprint + mark as docs bug, ipanova will split part into a new issue
15:52:49 <pulpbot> dalley: 3 issues left to triage: 3259, 3270, 3277
15:52:49 <dalley> #topic MongoDB 3 support - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3259
15:52:50 <pulpbot> Issue #3259 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:52:51 <pulpbot> MongoDB 3 support - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3259
15:53:09 <daviddavis> I'm tempted to close this out. no one's asking for it and our time could be better spent elsewhere.
15:53:20 <daviddavis> fedora is already on mongo 3 too
15:53:46 <rchan> daviddavis: we already support mongo 3, right?
15:54:04 <dkliban> rchan: we do ... this is more about dropping support for 2
15:54:05 <daviddavis> rchan: that's correct. we just don't have it as a dependency for rhel/centos users
15:54:05 <rchan> this was just to drop mongo 2 support and update our min to >= 3.0
15:54:15 <daviddavis> yea pretty much
15:54:20 <asmacdo> Can we convert to an ungroomed task and leave open?
15:54:31 <rchan> I think we will do this at some point
15:54:42 <rchan> but i agree we have no driver at this time
15:55:11 <daviddavis> accepting it and leaving it open/ungroomed for now seems like a good idea to me
15:55:23 <rchan> and technically, upstream will need to support running with Mongo 2 until all of our stakeholders are Ok with not doing that
15:55:57 <daviddavis> yea
15:56:12 <dalley> !propose accept
15:56:12 <dalley> #idea Proposed for #3259: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:56:13 <pulpbot> dalley: Proposed for #3259: Leave the issue as-is, accepting its current state.
15:56:29 <asmacdo> !propose other convert to task and accept
15:56:29 <asmacdo> #idea Proposed for #3259: convert to task and accept
15:56:29 <pulpbot> asmacdo: Proposed for #3259: convert to task and accept
15:56:33 <daviddavis> +1
15:56:34 <jortel> +1
15:56:38 <ttereshc> +1
15:56:43 <dalley> +1
15:57:02 <dalley> !accept
15:57:02 <dalley> #agreed convert to task and accept
15:57:02 <pulpbot> dalley: Current proposal accepted: convert to task and accept
15:57:03 <pulpbot> dalley: 2 issues left to triage: 3270, 3277
15:57:04 <dalley> #topic Improve exception handling for incorrect feed_url - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3270
15:57:04 <pulpbot> Issue #3270 [NEW] (unassigned) - Priority: Normal | Severity: Medium
15:57:05 <pulpbot> Improve exception handling for incorrect feed_url - http://pulp.plan.io/issues/3270
15:58:05 * ttereshc thought we had a similar issue filed, but she was not able to find it
16:08:18 <daviddavis> welcome back pulpbot
16:08:37 <dalley> pulpbot: NullPointerException
16:08:37 <pulpbot> dalley: Error: "NullPointerException" is not a valid command.
16:28:03 <pcreech> re: pulpbot, networking issues in it's hosting infrastructure again :(
16:29:11 <jortel> asmacdo: the CreatedResource should be cascade deleted when either the task or the resource is deleted.
16:30:18 <asmacdo> jortel, i was thinking it was marginally better to keep the record
16:30:27 <asmacdo> the task did create an object, but now its gone
16:31:46 <jortel> The information is only useful when the references are valid.
16:35:56 <jortel> though, not sure how to get django  GenericForeignKey to cascade delete
16:36:54 <jortel> looks like on_delete is not supported.
16:37:10 <jortel> but havent looked very hard
16:43:48 <asmacdo> jortel: how about https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3265 at least for now
16:44:25 * milan_ calls it a day
16:44:34 <jortel> asmacdo: yeah, seems fine as a short term fix
16:44:38 <milan_> have a nice weekend folks!
16:44:44 <jortel> c'ya, milan_
16:44:59 <milan_> o/
16:46:14 <jortel> asmacdo: approved
16:47:39 <asmacdo> \o
17:48:41 <bmbouter> do you sometimes get connection refused from repos.fedorapeople.org?
17:49:19 <asmacdo> bmbouter: yeah I have
17:49:51 <dkliban> bmbouter: might be a dns problem
17:50:07 <dkliban> try setting /etc/resolve.conf to use 8.8.8.8
17:50:18 <dkliban> and then restart your workers also
17:50:24 <bmbouter> ty
17:51:39 <daviddavis> fwiw, I have the same problem too sometimes
17:52:03 <bmbouter> that was it I think
18:13:06 <dalley> bmbouter, yeah I see that fairly often
19:08:34 <misa> pcreech: hi, when is 2.15.0 (GA) expected to go out?
19:09:27 <dkliban> misa: he is out today
19:09:52 <dkliban> misa: but i think it should be next wednesday
19:13:14 <bmbouter> I think this page is out of date https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/2150_Release_Status
19:13:51 <dkliban> just a little
19:40:04 <misa> dkliban: ouch. I am scheduled to push it out to production on Friday. Hopefully I can push final builds to our test systems on Wed.
19:49:06 <bmbouter> misa: did you try out the RC? that is expected to be behaviorally identical
19:53:40 <misa> bmbouter: not yet, I am still running the beta
19:53:52 * misa goes to install it
19:54:15 <bmbouter> I would probably still do a final test run on Wed after GA is announced, but in terms of what to expect that RC should be it
19:55:25 <misa> ah ok, still the beta url. I'll just run an update then
20:13:46 <jortel> asmacdo: Looks like https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3259 added another tasks.py.  there was a tasking.py already and I think the imports should have been added there.
20:39:10 <jortel> bmbouter: question about asyncio when you can hop on a chat.  no hurry, can wait til next week.
20:52:21 <bmbouter> jortel: cool, a time on monday would be ideal
20:52:25 <bmbouter> I'm dealing w/ a QMF bug
20:52:31 <bmbouter> reporting/working aroun
20:52:34 <bmbouter> around
20:52:36 <jortel> lucky you
20:52:57 <bmbouter> it's good, it'll be easy for them to fix
20:53:05 <bmbouter> I think it's a Python3 issue in their library
20:55:22 <jortel> ah, interesting
20:55:52 <bmbouter> yup
20:56:07 <bmbouter> jortel: my calendar is up to date for monday if you want to pick a time it's totally open
20:56:13 <bmbouter> we could do first thing for whatever time that is
20:56:15 <bmbouter> if you wanted
20:56:38 <jortel> okay.  I'll pulp something on the cal.
20:56:45 <jortel> er, put :)
20:58:12 <bmbouter> haha, ok thanks
21:14:36 <daviddavis> jortel: for the file plugin, it's just me and you. do we need to plan anything?
21:15:30 <jortel> daviddavis: been thinking about that today.  Let's setup a planning meeting (you and me) for next week.  We should write up all the use cases.  should not take long.
21:15:42 <daviddavis> jortel: ok, I'll send an invite
21:15:54 <jortel> daviddavis: thanks.